Yargılanan vicdanî ret hakkı
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2017
Yazarlar
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Özet
Özet: Vicdanî ret hakkı, yaygın kullanım s?ekliyle dinî, ahlakî, insanî, felsefî veya politik nedenlerle askerlik yükümlülüg?ünü yerine getirmeyi reddetme s?eklidir. Avrupa ülkeleri bas?ta olmak üzere bugün demokratik kabul edilen çog?u ülkede, farklı uygulamalar söz konusu olsa da, vicdanî ret temel bir hak olarak kabul edilmis?tir. Bu çalıs?mada ise vicdanî ret hakkının bir hak olarak uluslararası hukukta tanınma süreci, uluslararası düzenlemeler ve iç hukuktaki mevcut düzenlemelerle ele alınmıs? olup Avrupa I?nsan Hakları Sözles?mesi (AI?HS) ve Avrupa I?nsan Hakları Mahkemesi (AI?HM) kararlarının ulusal pozitif hukuka etkisi deg?erlendirilmis?tir. Çalıs?manın esasında ise vicdanî itirazlar nedeniyle söz konusu olan ceza yargılamaları iki dava özelinde irdelenmis?tir. İncelenen davalarda görülmektedir ki, vicdanî ret özellikle AI?HM içtihatları ve Anayasa’nın doksanıncı maddesinin bes?inci fıkrası gereg?i bir hak olarak kabul edilmekle birlikte vicdanî redde ilis?kin yasal düzenlemelerin yoklug?u tartıs?malı yargı kararlarına neden olmus?tur.
Abstract: The common used form of the right to conscientious objection is refusal to perform military duties for religious, moral, humane, philosophical or political reasons. In European countries, today considered the most democratic countries, although there are different applications, conscientious objection has been recognized as a fundamental right. This study examines the recognition process of conscientious objection in international law as a right, the current international and national arrangements, the influence of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on the Turkish national law. The main body of the study assesses two cases of criminal procedure. It should be noted that, in both cases, the absence of legislation regarding the denial of conscience has led to controversial trials. This is in spite of the fact that according to the European Court of Human Rights case law, and the fifth paragraph of ninetieth article in Turkish Constitution, such legislation is considered as a right.
Abstract: The common used form of the right to conscientious objection is refusal to perform military duties for religious, moral, humane, philosophical or political reasons. In European countries, today considered the most democratic countries, although there are different applications, conscientious objection has been recognized as a fundamental right. This study examines the recognition process of conscientious objection in international law as a right, the current international and national arrangements, the influence of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), and the decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) on the Turkish national law. The main body of the study assesses two cases of criminal procedure. It should be noted that, in both cases, the absence of legislation regarding the denial of conscience has led to controversial trials. This is in spite of the fact that according to the European Court of Human Rights case law, and the fifth paragraph of ninetieth article in Turkish Constitution, such legislation is considered as a right.
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Vicdanî Ret, Din ve Vicdan Özgürlüg?ü, Ceza Yargılaması, Enver Aydemir, Serdar Delice, Conscientious Objection, Freedom of Religion and Conscience, Criminal Procedure
Kaynak
Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi
