Ankara tabip odası gezi davası’na mütalaa, PHR danışman raporu ve felsefi yaklaşımlar
Loading...
Date
2014-05
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Toplum ve Hekim
Access Rights
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Abstract
ÖZET: Sağlık Bakanlığı tarafından Ankara Tabip Odası’na (ATO) karşı “izinsiz revir açmak”“amaç dışı faaliyette bulunmak” iddialarıyla açılan Yönetim Kurulu ve Onur Kurulu’nun görevden alınması talepli davaya ilişkin hukukçular tarafından hazırlanan mütalaalar, İnsan Hakları İçin Hekimler Örgütü’nün fahri danışman raporu ve felsefe alanından akademisyenlerin değerlendirmeleri yer almaktadır.
ABSTRACT: The Ministry of Health brought a court case against the Ankara Chamber of Medicine for “launching infirmaries without permission” and “conducting activities out of its mission and mandate”, asking for the dismissal of the governing bodies of the Chamber. Concerning the case, the article gives the opinions of lawyers, a report by the volunteer consultant to the Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) and assessments by academics in the field of philosophy.
ABSTRACT: The Ministry of Health brought a court case against the Ankara Chamber of Medicine for “launching infirmaries without permission” and “conducting activities out of its mission and mandate”, asking for the dismissal of the governing bodies of the Chamber. Concerning the case, the article gives the opinions of lawyers, a report by the volunteer consultant to the Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) and assessments by academics in the field of philosophy.
Description
Keywords
Gezi süreci, ATO davası mütalaa, Sağlık Bakanlığı, ATO davası etik değerlendirme, Gezi process, opinions on the ATO case, ATO court case ethical evaluation, ATO court case, PHR, ATO davası
Journal or Series
Toplum ve Hekim
