Compromise Rules Revisited

dc.contributor.authorÖzkal Sanver, İpek
dc.contributor.authorMerlin, Vincent
dc.contributor.authorSanver, Mert Remzi
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-28T06:49:28Z
dc.date.available2021-06-28T06:49:28Z
dc.date.issued2019-02-15
dc.description.abstractDecision makers often face a dilemma when they have to arbitrate between the quantity of support for a decision (i.e., the number of people who back it) and the quality of support (i.e., at which level to go down in voters’ preferences to obtain sufficient level of support). The trade-off between the quality and quantity of support behind alternatives led to numerous suggestions in social choice theory: without being exhaustive we can mention Majoritarian Compromise, Fallback Bargaining, Set of Efficient Compromises, Condorcet Practical Method, Median Voting Rule, Majority Judgement. Our point is that all these concepts share a common feature which enables us to gather them in the same class, the class of compromise rules, which are all based upon elementary scoring rules described extensively by Saari. One can exploit his results to analyze the compromise rules with relative ease, which is a major point of our paper.en_US
dc.fullTextLevelFull Texten_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10726-018-9598-2
dc.identifier.issn0926-2644
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85057977944en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/3899
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-018-9598-2
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000458431300004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.issue1en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.nationalInternationalen_US
dc.numberofauthors3en_US
dc.pages63 - 78en_US
dc.publisherSPRINGERen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGroup Decision and Negotiationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBordaen_US
dc.subjectCompromiseen_US
dc.subjectCondorceten_US
dc.subjectSaarien_US
dc.subjectScoring rulesen_US
dc.subjectVotingen_US
dc.titleCompromise Rules Revisited
dc.typeArticle
dc.volume28en_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
2019Sanver.pdf
Boyut:
504.26 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.71 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: