Contextualizing subjective well-being of children in different domains: Does higher safety provide higher subjective well-being for child citizens?

dc.authoridAkkan, Başak/0000-0002-5680-3553|Erdogan, Emre/0000-0001-8352-4990
dc.authorwosidMuderrisoglu, Serra/AAY-3808-2020
dc.authorwosidAkkan, Başak/AAG-3226-2021
dc.authorwosidErdogan, Emre/V-4730-2017
dc.contributor.authorUyan-Semerci, Pinar
dc.contributor.authorErdogan, Emre
dc.contributor.authorAkkan, Basak
dc.contributor.authorMuderrisoglu, Serra
dc.contributor.authorKaratay, Abdullah
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:42:30Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:42:30Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractAccording to the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, all children are born with civil, political, social and economic rights. However, children's ability to exercise their citizenship rights and practices depend on which country context they live in. Within the limits of this article we want to explore how children's subjective wellbeing is affected by the level of safety provided within the larger country context by using data collected by the consortium of the International Survey of Children's Well-Being. The question we elaborate is whether there is a relationship between the welfare context and subjective well-being of children with respect to different domains, and whether age and gender play a role. We first cluster welfare contexts with selected indicators from international reports among the selected countries of the Children's World Survey from high to low safety provided for children. Then, by referring to the existing literature, we propose six domains for analyzing children's subjective well-being: Health; Material conditions; Education; Risk and Safety; Relationships, and Self-perception. By analyzing each domain we ask whether there is a linear relation between the levels of safety welfare contexts and the subjective well-being of children in different domains and whether this hypothetical relationship exists after controlling for the age and gender of participants. According to our findings, high and medium welfare contexts provide higher subjective well-being in the domains of 'material' and 'risk and safety'. Girls have lower subjective well-being in the low safety welfare context compared to boys. We also find that in the domains of education and relationship, girls' subjective well-being is higher than boys in every safety welfare contexts. Last but not least we also find that the high safety welfare context has a lower average in the self-perception domain and also there is gender difference, girls compared' to boys are less satisfied with themselves.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.050
dc.identifier.endpage62en_US
dc.identifier.issn0190-7409
dc.identifier.issn1873-7765
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85021828719en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage52en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.06.050
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/7305
dc.identifier.volume80en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000411302300007en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofChildren and Youth Services Reviewen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectChildren's Subjective Wellbeingen_US
dc.subjectWelfare Contexten_US
dc.subjectDomainsen_US
dc.subjectAgeen_US
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.subjectResponse Biasen_US
dc.subjectWelfareen_US
dc.subjectPolicyen_US
dc.subjectStateen_US
dc.titleContextualizing subjective well-being of children in different domains: Does higher safety provide higher subjective well-being for child citizens?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar