Interaction structures as predictors of outcome in a naturalistic study of psychodynamic child psychotherapy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorwosidBulut, Pelinsu/JPX-9653-2023
dc.contributor.authorHalfon, Sibel
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Geoff
dc.contributor.authorBulut, Pelinsu
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:45:12Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:45:12Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The first aim of this study was to identify interaction structures (IS), which refer to clusters of items characterizing the course of psychotherapy in terms of reciprocal interaction patterns between the therapist and the child, secondly to assess their trends over the course of treatment, and finally investigate which IS predict outcome in long-term psychodynamic child psychotherapy. Method: The sample included 52 children with externalizing and internalizing problems. 192 sessions were rated with the use of the Child Psychotherapy Q-Set (CPQ). Outcome was assessed with the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) Total Problems, and Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS). Results: A principal components analysis resulted in four IS, theoretically named Therapeutic Alliance, Children's Emotion Expression, Child -Centered Technique and Psychodynamic Technique. Multilevel Modeling (MLM) analyses indicated significant linear growth on Psychodynamic Technique. Multiple regression analyses indicated that Psychodynamic Technique positively predicted changes on CBCL Total Problems and CGAS. In contrast, Child-Centered technique negatively predicted change on CBCL Total Problems, however follow up interaction analyses showed that externalizing children who received more Child-Centered technique showed more improvement on this scale. Discussion: Findings point to empirically derived components of psychodynamic child psychotherapy and provide preliminary answers about which aspects may facilitate change.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [215K180]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research was partially funded by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) Project Number 215K180 and the funds were used in partial support for CPQ codingsen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10503307.2018.1519267
dc.identifier.endpage266en_US
dc.identifier.issn1050-3307
dc.identifier.issn1468-4381
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30189798en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85053352720en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage251en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2018.1519267
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/7444
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000539344100009en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofPsychotherapy Researchen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPsychodynamic Child Psychotherapyen_US
dc.subjectİnteraction Structuresen_US
dc.subjectChild Psychotherapy Q-Seten_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic Allianceen_US
dc.subjectTechniqueen_US
dc.subjectCognitive-Behavioral Therapyen_US
dc.subjectExpert Clinician Prototypesen_US
dc.subjectRelationship Variablesen_US
dc.subjectFamily-Therapyen_US
dc.subjectAllianceen_US
dc.subjectAdolescentsen_US
dc.titleInteraction structures as predictors of outcome in a naturalistic study of psychodynamic child psychotherapyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Web of Science Indexed Publications
PubMed Indexed Publications
Scopus Indexed Publications