Comparison of relative INAA and k0-INAA using proficiency test materials at ITU TRIGA Mark II research reactor

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridESEN, AYSE NUR/0000-0003-4211-7728|ERENTURK, Sema/0000-0001-9938-1285|Haciyakupoglu, Sevilay/0000-0002-7847-9766
dc.authorwosidESEN, AYSE NUR/J-4189-2015
dc.authorwosidERENTURK, Sema/O-1053-2013
dc.authorwosidHaciyakupoglu, Sevilay/N-9642-2013
dc.contributor.authorEsen, Ayse Nur
dc.contributor.authorHaciyakupoglu, Sevilay
dc.contributor.authorErenturk, Sema
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:42:14Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:42:14Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesien_US
dc.description7th International K0-Users Workshop -- SEP 03-08, 2017 -- Montreal, CANADAen_US
dc.description.abstractProficiency testing is an important way of evaluating the analytical method used in the laboratory. In recent years, neutron activation analysis studies performed in ITU TRIGA Mark II reactor comprised five proficiency tests organized by Wageningen evaluating programs for analytical laboratories. In this study, the results obtained by relative INAA and k (0)-INAA method for 16 elements in soil and plant samples are presented. Since both methods have some advantages compared to each other, the possible approach for the laboratory should be to combine relative INAA and k (0)-INAA results.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPolytechnique Montreal,Int Atom Energy Agcyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInternational Atomic Energy Agency [TC RER 1/007]; Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS); Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) [212T190]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors are thankful to International Atomic Energy Agency for their support under regional TC RER 1/007 project and to Czech Academy of Sciences (CAS) and Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) that supported the Joint Research and Development Project (TUBITAK Project No: 212T190) on k0-INAA studies at ITU TRIGA Mark II reactor.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10967-017-5669-0
dc.identifier.endpage683en_US
dc.identifier.issn0236-5731
dc.identifier.issn1588-2780
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85039840554en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage677en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-017-5669-0
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/7197
dc.identifier.volume315en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000426219900026en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectProficiency Testingen_US
dc.subjectInaaen_US
dc.subjectTrıgaen_US
dc.subjectSoilen_US
dc.subjectPlanten_US
dc.subjectWepalen_US
dc.subjectNeutron-Activation Analysisen_US
dc.titleComparison of relative INAA and k0-INAA using proficiency test materials at ITU TRIGA Mark II research reactor
dc.typeConference Object

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Web of Science Indexed Publications
Scopus Indexed Publications