Comparison of Three Nutritional Screening Tools to Predict Malnutrition Risk and Detect Distinctions Between Tools in Cancer Patients Receiving Radiochemotherapy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAtasoy, Beste/0000-0003-1320-9105
dc.authorwosidAtasoy, Beste/AAG-9232-2021
dc.authorwosidAtasoy, Beste/L-5144-2015
dc.contributor.authorDemirel, Birsen
dc.contributor.authorAtasoy, Beste M.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:55:10Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:55:10Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to compare three screening tools for malnutrition in patients with head and neck cancers or central nervous system tumors (CNS) who are undergoing radio-chemotherapy. The study evaluated 124 adult cancer patients. The Subjective Global Assessment (SGA), Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA), and Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) were chosen to assess the risk of malnutrition. The prevalence of patients at nutritional risk was 31% with SGA, 31% with MNA and 23% with NRS-2002 in all patients. The agreement between SGA and MNA was substantial (k = 0.886, P<0.001); the agreement between SGA and NRS-2002 was moderate (k = 0.713, P<0.001); and the agreement between MNA and NRS-2002 was also moderate (k = 0.795, P<0.001). In subgroup analysis, SGA and MNA substantially (k = 0.973, P<0.001), SGA and NRS-2002 moderately (k =0.722, P<0.001), and MNA and NRS-2002 moderately (k =0.747, P<0.001) agreed in head and neck cancer patients. In CNS tumor patients, SGA and MNA slightly (k = 0.390, P = 0.005), SGA and NRS-2002 fairly (k = 0.457, P = 0.001), and MNA and NRS-2002 substantially (k = 0.878, P<0.001) agreed. The best agreement in tools was observed between SGA with MNA in all patients. Further studies in different tumor groups will enhance our understanding of current tools for malnutrition detection of radiotherapy patient.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01635581.2018.1491606
dc.identifier.endpage873en_US
dc.identifier.issn0163-5581
dc.identifier.issn1532-7914
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.pmid30273006en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85054400743en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage867en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01635581.2018.1491606
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/8757
dc.identifier.volume70en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000457554200005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofNutrition and Cancer-An International Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectSubjective Global Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectQuality-Of-Lifeen_US
dc.subjectClinical-Outcomesen_US
dc.subjectEspen Guidelinesen_US
dc.subjectWeight-Lossen_US
dc.subjectHeaden_US
dc.subjectNecken_US
dc.subjectCachexiaen_US
dc.subjectImpacten_US
dc.titleComparison of Three Nutritional Screening Tools to Predict Malnutrition Risk and Detect Distinctions Between Tools in Cancer Patients Receiving Radiochemotherapyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Web of Science Indexed Publications
PubMed Indexed Publications
Scopus Indexed Publications