To block or not to block: European approaches to content regulation, and implications for freedom of expression [2-s2.0-77955598996]

dc.authorscopusid8908175300
dc.contributor.authorAkdeniz, Y.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:16:49Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:16:49Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.description.abstractBased on the limited effectiveness of state laws, and lack of harmonization at international level a number of states started to introduce policies to block access to Internet content and websites deemed illegal which are situated outside their legal jurisdiction. However, blocking policies are not always subject to due process principles, decisions are not necessarily taken by the courts of law, and often administrative bodies or Internet hotlines run by the private sector decide which content or website should be subject to blocking. Therefore, increasingly, the compatibility of blocking action is questioned with regards to the fundamental right of freedom of expression. This article assesses significant developments at the pan-European level with regards to the development, and implementation of Internet content blocking policies. Adaptation of content blocking policies from certain member states of both the European Union and the Council of Europe will be used to assess the nature and implementation of access blocking policies. It will be argued that there could be a breach of Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights if blocking measures or filtering tools are used at state level to silence politically motivated speech on the Internet. © 2010 Xiaolu Zhang. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Allrights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.clsr.2010.03.004
dc.identifier.endpage272en_US
dc.identifier.issn0267-3649
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-77955598996en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage260en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2010.03.004
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/6283
dc.identifier.volume26en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofComputer Law and Security Reviewen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectAccess Blockingen_US
dc.subjectCensorshipen_US
dc.subjectFiltersen_US
dc.subjectFreedom Of Expressionen_US
dc.subjectHotlinesen_US
dc.subjectIllegal And Harmful Contenten_US
dc.subjectInternet Content Regulationen_US
dc.subjectNotice And Take Downen_US
dc.subjectAccess Blockingen_US
dc.subjectCensorshipen_US
dc.subjectFiltersen_US
dc.subjectFreedom Of Expressionen_US
dc.subjectHotlinesen_US
dc.subjectIllegal And Harmful Contenten_US
dc.subjectInternet Content Regulationen_US
dc.subjectNotice And Take Downen_US
dc.subjectCrimeen_US
dc.subjectLaws And Legislationen_US
dc.subjectWorld Wide Weben_US
dc.subjectInterneten_US
dc.titleTo block or not to block: European approaches to content regulation, and implications for freedom of expression [2-s2.0-77955598996]en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar