Outcomes of reconstructive techniques in breast cancer using BCCT. core software

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridOzmen, Vahit/0000-0003-2973-8247|Celebi, Filiz/0000-0003-4020-4019|Kurt yazar, Sevgi/0000-0003-3416-8605
dc.authorwosidOzmen, Vahit/AAE-3904-2020
dc.authorwosidCelebi, Filiz/AAR-3071-2020
dc.contributor.authorKurt, Sevgi
dc.contributor.authorIlguen, Ahmet Serkan
dc.contributor.authorOzkurt, Enver
dc.contributor.authorSoybir, Gursel
dc.contributor.authorAlco, Gul
dc.contributor.authorUnal, Caglar
dc.contributor.authorCelebi, Filiz Elbuken
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:49:03Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:49:03Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackgroundSurgery remains a priority for breast cancer treatment. This study aimed to compare the cosmetic outcomes of oncoplastic patients who had undergone breast-conserving surgery, mini-LDF (latissimus dorsi flap), and immediate implant reconstruction using both the Japanese scale and the BCCT.core (The Breast Cancer Conservative Treatment cosmetic results software) program and to validate this program.Patients and methodsPatients who underwent surgery for breast cancer between 1997 and 2021 were retrospectively studied. Patients were divided into three groups: 1-those who had undergone breast-conserving surgery (245 patients, 71.3%), 2-those who had undergone mini-LDF after lumpectomy (38 patients, 11.02%), and 3- those who underwent reconstruction with implants after nipple-sparing mastectomy (61 patients, 17.68%). The patients were called for a follow-up examination, and their photos were taken. The photographs were shown to an independent breast surgeon and a plastic surgeon who was not included in the surgeries, and they were asked to evaluate and rate them according to the Japanese cosmetic evaluation scale. The same images were transferred to the computer and scored using BCCT.core.ResultsThe plastic and breast surgeon evaluation results showed no significant difference between the three cosmetic techniques (p = 0.99, 0.98).The results of BCCT.core software measurements were similar to the results of plastic and breast surgeons (p: 0.43).ResultsThe plastic and breast surgeon evaluation results showed no significant difference between the three cosmetic techniques (p = 0.99, 0.98).The results of BCCT.core software measurements were similar to the results of plastic and breast surgeons (p: 0.43).ConclusionPatients are more knowledgeable about cosmetic outcomes and expect more objective data. In this study, we used 3 different cosmetic evaluation scales. We found that these techniques give results that are compatible with each other in terms of evaluating the work done in a more concrete way. For this reason, we recommend the use of such software, which offers objective results in a subjective field such as aesthetics and is very easy to apply.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12957-024-03343-3
dc.identifier.issn1477-7819
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid38519998en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85188536994en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-024-03343-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/8046
dc.identifier.volume22en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001189255200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBmcen_US
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Journal of Surgical Oncologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBreast Reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectImplant Reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectPatient Outcomesen_US
dc.subjectBreast Canceren_US
dc.subjectQuality-Of-Lifeen_US
dc.subjectConserving Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectWomenen_US
dc.titleOutcomes of reconstructive techniques in breast cancer using BCCT. core software
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Web of Science Indexed Publications
PubMed Indexed Publications
Scopus Indexed Publications