Adult protection in Turkish and Swiss civil law

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSuzel, Ece Bas
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-04T18:55:50Z
dc.date.available2026-04-04T18:55:50Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurposeThis paper aims to examine the legal frameworks for adult protection in Turkish and Swiss civil law, highlighting their differences in approach. While both legal systems aim to safeguard vulnerable adults, Turkish law adheres to state-controlled guardianship, whereas Swiss law prioritizes self-determination through voluntary protection measures. The study explores the effectiveness of these frameworks and their alignment with contemporary needs.Design/methodology/approachA comparative legal analysis is conducted, evaluating the substantive provisions of Turkish and Swiss law on adult protection. The study focuses on the comparison of legal systems, the analysis of voluntary protection measures and the evolving need for reform in adult protection law. Relevant legislative texts, case law and international legal instruments are examined.FindingsThe findings reveal that Swiss law offers a more flexible, autonomy-based model, allowing individuals to plan for their future incapacity through private mandate or advance directive. In contrast, Turkish law remains restrictive, relying on numerus clausus guardianship measures that limit autonomy. The study underscores the need for Turkey to modernize its legal framework by integrating voluntary protec-tion mechanisms and enhancing self-determination in adult protection law. In light of these comparative insights, the paper concludes with policy recommendations aimed at promoting a gradual shift from state-centered guardianship to a rights-based model aligned with international human rights standards.Originality/valueThis study provides a unique comparative perspective on adult protection in two civil law countries, Turkish and Swiss law, addressing a critical gap in legal literature. It contributes to ongoing discussions on guardianship reform, and the harmonization of adult protection laws in line with international human rights standards. Moreover, the contrast between the two civil law systems - each representing distinct approaches to adult protection - provides valuable insights for comparative scholars, particularly those interested in evaluating the adaptability of legal models across civil and common law jurisdictions.
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JAP-03-2025-0011
dc.identifier.doi10.1108/JAP-03-2025-0011
dc.identifier.endpage282
dc.identifier.issn1466-8203
dc.identifier.issn2042-8669
dc.identifier.issue5
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105007796066
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage262
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-03-2025-0011
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/10574
dc.identifier.volume27
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001504360500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEmerald Group Publishing Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Adult Protection
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260402
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260402
dc.subjectAdult Protection
dc.subjectGuardianship
dc.subjectFamily Guardianship
dc.subjectSelf-Determination
dc.subjectVoluntary Measures
dc.titleAdult protection in Turkish and Swiss civil law
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Web of Science Indexed Publications
Scopus Indexed Publications