Revisiting the connection between the no-show paradox and monotonicity
dc.WoS.categories | Economics; Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications; Social Sciences, Mathematical Methods | en_US |
dc.authorid | 0000-0001-9890-5876 | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nunez, Matias | |
dc.contributor.author | Sanver, Mehmet Remzi | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-25T12:12:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-11-25T12:12:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017-11 | |
dc.description.abstract | We investigate the relation between monotonicity and the no-show paradox in voting rules. Although the literature has established their logical independence, we show, by presenting logical dependency results, that the two conditions are closer than a general logical independency result would suggest. Our analysis is made both under variable and fixed-size electorates. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | en_US |
dc.fullTextLevel | Full Text | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.02.003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85045435231 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11411/2728 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2017.02.003 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000414878000003 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.issue | SI | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.national | International | en_US |
dc.numberofauthors | 2 | en_US |
dc.pages | 42979 | en_US |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | MATHEMATICAL SOCIAL SCIENCES | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.title | Revisiting the connection between the no-show paradox and monotonicity | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.volume | 90 | en_US |