Individual cognitive structures and collaboration patterns in academia

dc.authorwosidOzel, Bulent/HIK-2741-2022
dc.contributor.authorOzel, Bulent
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:42:16Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:42:16Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesien_US
dc.description13th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics -- JUL 04-07, 2011 -- Univ Zululand, Durban, SOUTH AFRICAen_US
dc.description.abstractThis article, elaborating on mutuality of knowledge and social structure theory borrowed from sociology of knowledge literature, where knowledge is perceived as an essentially social and societal category, develops a coherent research framework which relates cognitive structure and the collaboration patterns into an integrated socio-knowledge analysis of a given scientific community. The framework extends co-word analysis combining it with social network analysis. The framework is enhanced by introducing a novel model. The new model maps actors from co-authorship networks into a strategic diagram of scientists. The mapping is based on cohesiveness and pervasiveness of issues each author has published in the field. The exemplary longitudinal case from Turkey covers scientific publication activities in Turkish management academia spanning the years from 1922 until 2008. It is seen that, while within local community diffusion of management knowledge is lead by academicians with certain socio-cognitive properties, academicians publishing at international arena do not show any significantly differing socio-cognitive properties, instead, they are merely embedded in strongly connected groups. Leading academicians within local community, however, exhibit a common socio-cognitive structure relative to the rest of the community. They have more social ties and more diversified disseminated knowledge compared to the rest. Knowledge they disseminate is distinct compared to their peers in the network, they hold certain part of their knowledge exclusively, thus knowledge-wise they don't resemble the rest, but they keep a level of common knowledge with the rest of the community.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipInt Soc Scientometr & Informetr (ISSI),Durban Univ Technolen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11192-012-0624-x
dc.identifier.endpage555en_US
dc.identifier.issn0138-9130
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84859434563en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage539en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0624-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/7213
dc.identifier.volume91en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000302478200017en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofScientometricsen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectScientific Collaborationen_US
dc.subjectCo-Authorship Networksen_US
dc.subjectSocio-Cognitive Analysisen_US
dc.subjectCo-Word Analysisen_US
dc.subjectSocial Network Analysisen_US
dc.subjectEmbeddednessen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge Diffusionen_US
dc.subjectCo-Word Analysisen_US
dc.subjectScienceen_US
dc.subjectMapsen_US
dc.titleIndividual cognitive structures and collaboration patterns in academia
dc.typeConference Object

Dosyalar