A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF CONVENTIONAL ULTRASOUND AND HIGH POWER PAIN THRESHOLD ULTRASOUND ON FROZEN SHOULDER

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorSahbaz, Yasemin
dc.contributor.authorTunali, Ayse Nur
dc.contributor.authorCakmak Reyhan, Aycan
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:52:24Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:52:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Frozen shoulder is a disease characterized by severe disruption of quality of life, pain and progressive limitation of movement. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of the high power pain threshold ultrasound (HPPT-US) and conventional ultrasound (C-US) on shoulder pain, the range of motion (ROM) and upper extremity functionality in frozen shoulder patients. Methods: Twenty voluntary patients (10 women, 10 men) with frozen shoulder were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment duration of both groups was 14 sessions and treatment program consists of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Cold Pack, Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation, and exercise training. In addition to the standard treatment programs, the HPPT-US was applied to the study group, and the C-US was administered to the control group for five minutes. All patients were evaluated three times before treatment, seventh session, and 14th session. The shoulder pain intensity was assessed with Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), joint range of motion (ROM) using Goniometric Measurement, and functional status with Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder. Hand (DASH). Results: There were significant differences in ROM, VAS, and DASH scores in both groups (p<0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups when the intra-group changes were calculated by taking the difference between the scores obtained before and after treatment (p>0.05). Conclusion: The patients with frozen shoulder benefited from both treatment programs, however, HPPT-US had no advantage over C-US.en_US
dc.identifier.endpage111en_US
dc.identifier.issn2651-4451
dc.identifier.issn2651-446X
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage104en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/8672
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000486629200005en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.language.isotren_US
dc.publisherTurkey Assoc Physiotherapistsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofTurkish Journal of Physiotherapy Rehabilitation-Turk Fizyoterapi Ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisien_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectFrozen Shoulderen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Therapy Modalitiesen_US
dc.subjectShoulder Painen_US
dc.subjectMyofascial Trigger Pointsen_US
dc.subjectAdhesive Capsulitisen_US
dc.subjectDouble-Blinden_US
dc.subjectTherapyen_US
dc.subjectMobilizationen_US
dc.subjectDisabilitiesen_US
dc.subjectManagementen_US
dc.subjectExerciseen_US
dc.subjectArmen_US
dc.titleA COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF CONVENTIONAL ULTRASOUND AND HIGH POWER PAIN THRESHOLD ULTRASOUND ON FROZEN SHOULDERen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Web of Science Indexed Publications