Yazar "Kartal, Gokce" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Relationship between E-health literacy and healthy lifestyle behaviours of Turkish health sciences students
    (Emerald Group Publishing Ltd, 2025) Cakir, Furkan; Ozturk, Sergen; Gercek, Hasan; Eryildiz, Ezgi; Kartal, Gokce; Polat, Mine Gulden
    PurposeE-health literacy (EHL) and healthy lifestyle behaviours (HLBs) are important for individuals receiving health education. Health professionals of the future should be conscious, e-health literate and develop HLBs. The aims of this study were to determine the EHL and HLBs of university students receiving health education and to examine the relationship between them. Design/methodology/approachA total of 1,454 health sciences students, between the ages of 18-27, were included in the study. Participants' data were collected online via Google Forms. Participants' EHL levels were assessed with the E-Health Literacy Scale. Participants' HLB were assessed with the Healthy Lifestyle Behaviours Scale II. FindingsPositive weak correlation was found between EHL and HLB (p < 0.001, r = 0.329). EHL scores of bachelor's degree students were higher than associate degree students (p = 0.004). HBL total score bachelor's and associate degree student scores were similar (p = 0.714). Originality/valueThis article addresses an important gap in understanding health sciences students' online reading habits about health and their relationship to HLB. Considering that there is a positive relationship between EHL and HLBs of students in the health departments of universities, increasing the EHL levels of students will help to increase HLBs.
  • Küçük Resim Yok
    Öğe
    Squat task as an assessment tool for detecting injury risk: A systematic review
    (Elsevier, 2026) Avci, Ender Ersin; Kartal, Gokce; Cakir, Furkan; Polat, Mine Gulden; Demirbuken, Lksan
    Background: The squat is a fundamental movement that is frequently performed in both daily life activities and sports. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and systematize evidence from the literature that relates the isolated squat movement to musculoskeletal injury risk assessment. Method: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus and ScienceDirect databases and Boolean operators. The study was registered in PROSPERO. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies assessment tools. The quality of the studies was assessed in accordance with the previously established research criteria. Results: A total of 7 studies were included out of the 4966 studies collected. The included studies were published between 2015 and 2023. The included studies demonstrated that different squat types such as double leg squat, single leg squat and overhead squat were used in injury risk assessment. Despite methodological differences between the included studies, the results showed that squatting can be used for injury risk assessment. Two studies have concluded that squat alone is not sufficient to assess the risk of injury. Conclusion: The squat task can provide convenience to clinicians when assessing the risk of injury, with its advantages such as ease of application and no equipment required. Review registration number: PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023479944).