An Integrated Bayesian Best-Worst Method and Consensus-Based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution Approach for Evaluating Alternative Aircraft Models from a Sustainability Perspective

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000-0002-7684-0319
dc.authorid0009-0003-9792-6116
dc.contributor.authorAri, Ergun
dc.contributor.authorDursun, Mehtap
dc.date.accessioned2026-04-04T18:56:08Z
dc.date.available2026-04-04T18:56:08Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractSustainability in transportation is vital for lessening environmental effects and ensuring the long-term viability of the transportation industry. The aviation sector, a significant player in sustainable transport, has encountered obstacles in reducing its ecological footprint, especially in aircraft design and operation. Symmetry and asymmetry exist widely in the aviation sector, as in other industrial applications. Multicriteria decision making (MCDM) is an important research topic that is widely applied to practical decision-making problems and is considered a complex tool with which to balance the symmetry between goals and conflicting criteria. This research assesses different airplane models in order to pinpoint the most environmentally friendly options using the Bayesian best-worst (BWM) method for evaluating criteria and the consensus-based intuitionistic fuzzy evaluation based on distance from average solution (IF EDAS) method for assessing alternatives. The Bayesian BWM approach facilitates group decision making on criteria evaluation and systematically evaluates factors like fuel efficiency, emissions, and noise levels, offering a holistic view of each airplane model's sustainability performance. Conversely, consensus-based IF EDAS allows for the ranking of alternatives based on their distance to the average solution for a sustainable airplane model while concurrently considering multiple criteria, guiding decisionmakers to a consensus and eliminating the asymmetry between opinions before the final decision. This study reveals that technical features are the critical criteria for airplanes and significantly influence alternative rankings. The findings indicate that the chosen decision criteria greatly impact the selection of the most sustainable airplane model as part of a sustainable transportation system, potentially altering ranking orders.
dc.description.sponsorshipGalatasaray University Research Fund; [FOA-2022-1092]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work is supported by Galatasaray University Research Fund Grant Number FOA-2022-1092.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/sym16081086
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/sym16081086
dc.identifier.issn2073-8994
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85202561502
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/sym16081086
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/10708
dc.identifier.volume16
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001307490600001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMdpi
dc.relation.ispartofSymmetry-Basel
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260402
dc.snmzKA_Scopus_20260402
dc.subjectSustainable Transportation
dc.subjectFuzzy Logic
dc.subjectBayesian Bwm
dc.subjectIf Edas
dc.subjectConsensus Model
dc.subjectMultiple-Criteria Decision Making
dc.titleAn Integrated Bayesian Best-Worst Method and Consensus-Based Intuitionistic Fuzzy Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution Approach for Evaluating Alternative Aircraft Models from a Sustainability Perspective
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Web of Science Indexed Publications
Scopus Indexed Publications