Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Polyurethane-Coated Implants: A 117-Patient Single-Center Study with Objective Cosmetic Evaluation

dc.contributor.authorKurt, Sevgi
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Isil Akgun
dc.contributor.authorCelik, Naci
dc.contributor.authorYazar, Memet
dc.contributor.authorOzkurt, Enver
dc.contributor.authorKoc, Ertan
dc.contributor.authorOzmen, Vahit
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-02T12:44:47Z
dc.date.available2026-07-02T12:44:47Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentİstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground Prepectoral breast reconstruction with polyurethane (PU)-coated implants has been proposed to enhance implant stability and reduce complications. Evidence regarding their clinical and aesthetic performance remains limited. Methods A retrospective review was performed on 117 patients (186 breasts) who underwent immediate prepectoral reconstruction with PU-coated implants between 2020 and 2025. Complications were analyzed with univariate and multivariable regression. Aesthetic outcomes were evaluated using BCCT.core software. Results At a median follow-up of 15 months, 34 patients (29.1%) experienced at least one complication, most commonly rippling or upper-pole visibility (16.2%). Implant loss occurred in 3.4% and capsular contracture in 1.7%. Higher BMI, larger implant size, and skin-reducing mastectomy were associated with increased complication risk, although none remained independently significant. Chemotherapy had no measurable impact, and radiotherapy showed only a mild trend toward poorer aesthetic scores. Overall, 81.2% of patients achieved excellent or good BCCT.core results. Younger age and absence of complications were the strongest predictors of favorable aesthetic outcomes. Conclusions PU-coated implants provided stable outcomes in prepectoral reconstruction, with low implant loss and rare contracture. Most patients achieved favorable cosmetic results without the need for additional reinforcement materials. Higher BMI, larger implants, smoking, and skin-reducing mastectomy increased complication risk primarily in univariate analyses. Prospective multicenter studies with longer follow-up and patient-reported outcomes are required to validate these findings.
dc.description.sponsorshipIstanbul Atlas University -- Open access funding provided by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkiye (TUB & Idot;TAK).
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00266-026-05901-4
dc.identifier.issn0364-216X
dc.identifier.issn1432-5241
dc.identifier.pmid42151611
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105039278685
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-026-05901-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/11045
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001768956900001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofAesthetic Plastic Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250701
dc.subjectPrepectoral breast reconstruction
dc.subjectPolyurethane-coated implants
dc.subjectMicrothane implants
dc.subjectBCCT.core
dc.subjectAesthetic outcomes
dc.subjectComplications
dc.titlePrepectoral Breast Reconstruction with Polyurethane-Coated Implants: A 117-Patient Single-Center Study with Objective Cosmetic Evaluation
dc.typeArticle

Files