The nation as an artichoke? A critique of ethnosymbolist interpretations of nationalism

dc.authorscopusid6507975121
dc.contributor.authorÖzkirimli, U.
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T20:17:12Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T20:17:12Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this article is to offer a critique of ethnosymbolism in the light of recent approaches to nations and nationalism. The article will engage with ethnosymbolist interpretations on three different levels. Since ethnosymbolists present their approach as an attempt to revise the modernist analysis from within, it will first address their critique of modernism. It will then assess the analytical contributions of ethnosymbolism, focusing in particular on four issues: the antiquity of nations and national feelings, the importance of the past for the present and the related issue of the role of elites in nation-formation, the notorious issue of resonance and the plurality of ethnic pasts. Finally, it will question the normative implications of ethnosymbolism and conclude that ethnosymbolism is more an attempt to resuscitate nationalism than to explain it.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1469-8219.00100
dc.identifier.endpage355en_US
dc.identifier.issn1354-5078
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0041530083en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage339en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00100
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11411/6444
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofNations and Nationalismen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectNationalismen_US
dc.subjectPost-Modernismen_US
dc.subjectTheoretical Studyen_US
dc.titleThe nation as an artichoke? A critique of ethnosymbolist interpretations of nationalismen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar