Adam-Troian, JaisArciszewski, ThomasApostolidis, Themistoklis2024-07-182024-07-1820190046-27721099-0992https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2576https://hdl.handle.net/11411/6934In France, laicite is a legal principle enforcing State secularism. However, research indicates that Modern (vs. traditional) beliefs about laicite (ML) help legitimate prejudice against minorities. From Social Identity Theory, we hypothesized that ML should be positively linked with national identification, stereotyping, prejudice and support for discrimination. Accordingly, we demonstrate that ML independently predicts support for discriminatory policies (Study 1a, N = 241) and Maghrebi IAT scores (Study 1b, N = 242). ML mediates the link between national identification and Generalized Prejudice (Study 2a, N = 215; Study 2d, N = 114) as well as Support for Discriminatory Policies (Study 2b, N = 250). Experimental corroboration of this mediation was provided (Study 2c, N = 100). An exploratory study showed that priming ML led to more support for discrimination through national identification (Study 3, N = 89). These results reveal the important intergroup regulation feature of ML beliefs in France.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessNational İdentificationPolitical JudgmentsLaiciteDiscriminationİntergroup RelationsImplicit Association TestCultural DistanceSocial-DominanceImmigrantsPrejudiceIdentityMulticulturalismValidationPsychologyIdeologyArticle2-s2.0-8506872410610.1002/ejsp.25769375Q192449Q2WOS:000474648500006