Trockel, Walter2021-06-162021-06-162014-050899-8256https://hdl.handle.net/11411/3784https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2013.12.012First via a counter example it is shown that Proposition 3 of Anbarci and Sun (2013) is false. Then a gap and a mistake in their proof are identified. Finally, a modified version of their Proposition 3 is stated and proved. © 2014 Elsevier Inc.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAxiomatic bargainingBargaining gamesDiscrete Raiffa solutionTU GameFuzzy CoalitionShapley ValueRobustness of intermediate agreements for the discrete Raiffa solutionArticle2-s2.0-8489637452210.1016/j.geb.2013.12.012Q1WOS:000335616100003